Alright then, I have picked out all of the questions asked, and I will answer them.
@puffy said in Legal Peacekeeping rights in the Historic District:
How would the Bloodhounds perform their duty as theoretical law enforcers?
They already do. There is just no legal recompense for defying them, so if you can kick their ass, you're free to go. We don't put our most powerful people on those streets, as is the same with every faction, the most powerful are out doing the most important things.
@v-rage said in Legal Peacekeeping rights in the Historic District:
what happens if the Greywatch get enough favour to replace the Bloodhounds in the Historic?
Then it would work just as it doeas now with the Greywatch. If they wish to bring their own vote to the council to change this, they are welcome to do so. However, they don't really follow the law as written, but their own personal form of justice, so I find it unlikely.
@v-rage said in Legal Peacekeeping rights in the Historic District:
Do they suddenly decide who are peacekeepers?
No. See above.
@prettysmitten said in Legal Peacekeeping rights in the Historic District:
aren't there Bloodhounds posted in the Historic district already?
Yes there are.
@prettysmitten said in Legal Peacekeeping rights in the Historic District:
Are you asking for permission to place more Bloodhounds in the district?
No.
@prettysmitten said in Legal Peacekeeping rights in the Historic District:
Are you wanting the Precept to be sole guard of the Historic?
No.
@prettysmitten said in Legal Peacekeeping rights in the Historic District:
I thought Greywatch and Precepts both guarded it. Or am I mistaken?
You are mistaken. The Precept and the Greywatch vie for position to have men watching the streets, for our own reasons, one of those reasons for the Precept, can be understood by reading the oath we take, in which it states "I promise to keep the laws"
@prettysmitten said in Legal Peacekeeping rights in the Historic District:
you state that you want rights that are granted in the lawbooks already, which law are you specifically addressing?
I want the council to agree that, should someone defy the peacekeepers put in place by the Precept Arcanum, they would be committing:
-Evasion of a Peace Official- Intentional deception, evasion, or misdirection aimed at a member of the Council or Militia.
Should they attack them they would be committing:
-Armed Assault- Using any means to inflict excessive physical or magical violence on an unwilling individual. An individual killed and returned by magical means or miracle is to be treated as Armed Assault, unless the individual is a brave hero of the revolution or officiate in service of the Councils.
Should they kill them in this attack they would be comitting:
-Murder- Causing, directly or through carelessness, the death of any Arabellan citizen or foreign diplomat.
@prettysmitten said in Legal Peacekeeping rights in the Historic District:
If such a law is already granted, then why are we talking about this?
Clearly, it isn't, otherwise the Knight of the Morning would have had charges brought against them when they diobeyed a reasonable request, attacked, and then murdered two bloodhounds in the district.
@v-rage said in Legal Peacekeeping rights in the Historic District:
I just want to know what you think should happen if the Precept can't send bloodhounds to guard the historic district due to lack of resources.
So far I've seen the Greywatch occasionally have guards there and once Luckbringers from the Tymoran church.
Should whoever has guards there decide who is peacekeepers there?
As stated above, if other organisations wish to petition the council for a similar stipulation, they are free to do so. I am petitioning this on behalf of the Precept Arcanum.
This should answer all questions asked thus far. If they are any other specific questions you wish answered, let's have them. We are about to be attacked by a preist who is fully aware of what happened when a knight of the morning did the same.
-Izereth