Liches and subtypes
-
[Zar Kaelas spends a lot time to find some notes about liches and it's subtypes, mostly arch-liches]
-
He finds a humorous sketch of a lich stuck between a collapsing arch. The capture reads, "Craglahn buried beneath the rubble of the Rivald Arch of Triumph by heroes who could not locate his phylactery, presumed trapped to this day."
He finds no reference to arch-liches, apparently they don't exist.
-
//arch-liches are the good liches (well, at least they have other alignment than evil one). they exist in DnD
[Zar looks for anything about the Lich King in Haunted Halls]
-
// Yes. I know exactly what the source books say.
/forum/viewtopic.php?p=176847#176847
Refer to point five, it may help guide you on how the library forum works. Basically, just because you as a person know about it from a source book doesn't mean it 1) exists or 2) is something your character has heard about, if it helps to know that.
-
// My character has basicaly a big chance of knowing about liches and such, because of his spellcasting relatives, so I suppose I will do a bit of research IG and then write an IG book about it
-
// No, actually, your character shouldn't know this–because unless you hear about it in game, it may very well be that arch-liches don't exist in our setting. Unless you find a book mentioning them, or you encounter one, you probably don't want to presume knowledge. Does that make sense?
-
// Ah, I'm starting to understand it in that case…alright, thanks
